n this post the author proclaims boldly that Grails has a “fraction of RoRs functionality”. So in the spirit of Relevance’s myth series (I’m not sure I’ll do more than one of these, we’ll see) let me sum up my feelings on this.

I would like to have jumped right onto the Rails bandwagon if it hadn’t been for the fact that ActiveRecord offers only a fraction of what Hibernate does.

• Where is the proper transaction & conversation support?
• Why is it that it hits the db orders of magnitude harder that Hibernate does and is infinitely slower?
• Where is the criteria support? What about distributed caching?

I would be Ruby maniac right now if Ruby didn’t offer only a fraction of what is available in Java. From the reams of web frameworks, to the dozens of persistence engines, to distributed caches, enterprise integration tools and testing frameworks. Java has it all. There is literally a library for everything.

And I would probably have said a long goodbye to Java, if it wasn’t for the fantastic innovation that is happening in projects like Spring and Hibernate and the libraries that integrate with them (Quartz, Sitemesh, Compass, Acegi, Webflow et al) which Grails is built on. Want an RMI, burlap, http, soap or DWR service? Just expose one. Need advanced declarative security at the web and business layer level? Plug it right in. Job scheduling? Job done. Search? Sure no problem.

Spring and all the projects that integrate with it, make the Java ecosystem a very happy place indeed. So no, Grails might not have RJS (yet), migrations (yet) or xyz feature from Rails, but it has plenty, thanks to the Java eco-system, to make up for it and then some.

– Graeme Rocher

Tags: Graeme Rocher, Grails